10 Panelists write:
Murdoch should have the courage to say, the buck stops here.
Presidents Reagan and Clinton are admired dearly for the success they brought to America in terms of cohesiveness, safety and prosperity . They did not do it personally but it was their charisma and leadership that produced the phenomenal results and the credit goes to them. And the blame would have gone to them, too, if they had failed.
Murdoch's organization is top-down and regardless of what happened that he was unaware of, he is responsible. It was a bold move on his part to shut down the tabloid in the United Kingdom, but what if other operations within his media empire should produce similar mischief?
Even though he is not elected by the public, he has an obligation to the stockholders to salvage the ship and consider the following options.
I would urge him to apologize with a commitment to revamp his news company to meet the highest standards of journalism, morals and ethics. That may be a 180 degree turn-around for their business model and may or may not work out. But it would be a worthwhile effort if he can turn this around and save the stockholders and keep another channel of communication alive for the public.
Alternatively he could resign and together with the stockholders, take a plunge as collective repentance for the wrongdoing.
As a pluralist and a social scientist, I see the wisdom of religion, every religion emphasizing salvation through repentance. Let there be relief for them and the public.
To read the opinions of all panelists, please visit Dallas Morning News at http://religionblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2011/07/texas-faith-what-responsibilit.html